Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mirror black |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Q70 has a global score of 77.9, which is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. Even though LG Q70 is noticeably newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it's a lot thicker and incredibly heavier. LG Q70 has a display that's just as good as the Moto Z2 Play one, because although the LG Q70 has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2310px.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features just a bit better hardware performance than LG Q70. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. LG Q70's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Moto Z2 Play one, both of them have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 captures much better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The LG Q70 counts with longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG Q70, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z2 Play, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.