Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Holographic white |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play is slightly better than the LG Stylo 6, having a 77.4 score against 76.7. The Moto Z2 Play design is way lighter and way thinner than the LG Stylo 6, although it was released 3 years before. LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px. LG Stylo 6's storage capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to the Moto Z2 Play one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Stylo 6 features longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. Moto Z2 Play takes slightly better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images in low light environments and a much better video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Moto Z2 Play is also cheaper than the LG Stylo 6.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.