Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a global score of 78.6 against 77.4. LG V10's body is older, way thicker and incredibly heavier than the Moto Z2 Play. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a superior processing power than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a higher number of faster cores.
LG V10 has a brighter display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a greater display density and a quite bigger screen. LG V10 shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG V10 also counts with faster 120 frames per second video frame rate and a much more megapixels back camera.
LG V10 has as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Moto Z2 Play, they have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same 64 GB internal memory. The LG V10 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in Motorola Moto Z2 Play.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto Z2 Play, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.