Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-06-29 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. LG V30S ThinQ is a thicker and just a little heavier phone than Moto Z2 Play. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little larger screen, a better pixels number in each display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger camera aperture and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with more storage for apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.