Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-06-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than Moto Z2 Play, although it is somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a much better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a quite bigger screen and a higher display pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ features as much memory to install applications and games as the Moto Z2 Play one, both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal storage.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture and a way better resolution back facing camera. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs more money than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.