Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's general score of 77.4. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it's heavier and incredibly thicker. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a greater pixels density, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a bigger screen.
LG V40 ThinQ's memory for apps and games is very similar to Motorola Moto Z2 Play's one, they have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels and the same (4K) video quality, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG V40 ThinQ features just a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.