Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is way newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier. LG V60 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot better video definition.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bigger storage for games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ features a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.