Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. The LG Velvet construction is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it is a lot thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG Velvet counts with a little bit better display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite worse pixel amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG Velvet features a better memory to store more apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG Velvet takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
LG Velvet features a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG Velvet is more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.