Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than Moto Z2 Play, with a general score of 91.2 against 77.4. LG Wing's design is noticeably newer than Moto Z2 Play's, but it's a lot heavier and thicker. LG Wing counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG Wing counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a larger display. LG Wing features a way better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate and a way higher resolution camera.
LG Wing features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG Wing features greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.