Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with an 89.6 score against 77.4. Motorola edge's design is noticeably newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Motorola edge and Motorola Moto Z2 Play both have extremely similar displays, because although the Motorola edge has a quite worse pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger screen.
Motorola edge counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola edge takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola edge also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola edge has a very superior memory for apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola edge features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.