Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Interstellar Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a overall score of 83.4 against 77.4. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a way newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it is way thicker and notably heavier. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger display.
Moto Z2 Play has more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Play features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 53 percent more battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a greater camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way better video definition and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.