Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is notably newer, but somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker than Moto Z2 Play. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger screen, a higher 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a quite greater count of pixels per display inch.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Moto Z2 Play features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes greater videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.