Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting an 87.1 score against 77.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it's thicker and much heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos, better 60 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.