Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Oxford blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is slightly better than Moto Z2 Play, getting an 84.6 score against 77.4. Motorola One 5G's body is incredibly newer, but notably thicker and noticeably heavier than the Moto Z2 Play. Motorola One 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola One 5G has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2520px resolution, a just a bit better display density and a bigger screen. Motorola One 5G has a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a camera with way more MP.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G has a superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.