Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Play, with an 81.6 score against 77.4. The Motorola One 5G Ace body is way newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it's a lot thicker and extremely heavier. Motorola One 5G Ace and Motorola Moto Z2 Play both count with really similar processing units, they have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Motorola One 5G Ace and Motorola Moto Z2 Play feature similar screens, because although the Motorola One 5G Ace has a bit worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Moto Z2 Play features a bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a very superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size. Motorola One 5G Ace shoots better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a camera in the back with way more MP.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.