Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. Motorola One Action's design is newer, but incredibly thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Motorola One Action's processor is just as good as Moto Z2 Play's processor, both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Motorola One Action has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Motorola One Action shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates.
The Motorola One Action has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One Action has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 17 percent more battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One Action, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z2 Play, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.