Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. Motorola One Hyper's design is much newer, but notably thicker and a lot heavier than Moto Z2 Play. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play and Motorola One Hyper feature similar displays, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola One Hyper has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper features longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto Z2 Play, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.