Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Blue and Brown |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a score of 80.7 against 77.4. Even though Motorola One Vision is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's much thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Play and Motorola One Vision both feature quite similar CPUs, both have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little higher pixel number per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. The Motorola One Vision has a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Moto Z2 Play features slightly more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Vision counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.