Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Meteor grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Play, having an 80.3 score against 77.4. Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a a lot newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Play, but it is a lot heavier and incredibly thicker. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a screen that's just as good as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play one, because although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a larger display. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.