Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. Nokia XR20's construction is a lot newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, but it's much thicker and incredibly heavier. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little inferior pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Play and Nokia XR20 have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Nokia XR20 has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Nokia XR20 features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 54 percent greater battery size. Nokia XR20 has a better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Nokia XR20, else you can save some money and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.