Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. Motorola Moto Z2 Play's construction is thinner and incredibly lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released many years before. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger screen.
The Moto Z2 Play features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Motorola Moto Z2 Play is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.