Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Ocean |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a general score of 83.1 against 77.4. Although the OPPO Find X2 Pro is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's notably thicker and a lot heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger display, a better screen density and a much better 1440 x 3168px resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster video frame rate and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.