Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a noticeably newer device than the Moto Z2 Play, although it is way heavier and a lot thicker. The Moto Z2 Play features a very superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger screen. Galaxy A25 5G has a better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.