Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30s is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a 79.8 score against 77.4. Galaxy A30s's construction is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it's thicker and heavier. Moto Z2 Play features a little faster processor than Galaxy A30s. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A30s takes slightly better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A30s also has a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Moto Z2 Play counts with slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.