Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a overall score of 82 against 77.4. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only design is notably newer and a lot lighter, but also incredibly thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a larger screen.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 LTE Only. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.