Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-06-29 | -- |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a score of 82.9 against 77.4. The Galaxy A34 design is lighter and noticeably thinner than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy A34 has a little bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Play. Both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A34 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Moto Z2 Play has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a way better battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size. Galaxy A34 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.