Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. The Galaxy A41 is a incredibly newer cellphone than Moto Z2 Play, but it's a lot thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy A41 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite larger display, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit higher display density.
The Moto Z2 Play has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A41. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A41 captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto Z2 Play has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A41, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A41 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.