Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a score of 85.5 against 77.4. Galaxy A51's design is incredibly newer, but noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Moto Z2 Play features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A51 features longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy A51 features a way better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.