Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a 90.8 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is notably newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, although it is a lot thicker and much heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A51 5G has a slightly better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a just a little higher pixels density and a larger display. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit more storage for games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.