Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a a lot newer cellphone than the Moto Z2 Play, but it is incredibly heavier and incredibly thicker. The Galaxy A52 features a bit sharper display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.