Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is way newer, but extremely thicker and notably heavier than the Moto Z2 Play. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with slightly more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy A71 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.