Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. Samsung Galaxy F41's design is extremely newer than Moto Z2 Play's, but it's incredibly heavier and incredibly thicker. The Galaxy F41 has a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger display, a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Moto Z2 Play has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy F41 has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy F41 shoots greater videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy F41 features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.