Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a global score of 88.1 against 77.4. The Galaxy F62 is a much newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but it's extremely thicker and noticeably heavier. The Galaxy F62 features just a bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy F62 features a little bit better display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display. The Galaxy F62 counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy F62 features a greater camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.