Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold is extremely newer than Moto Z2 Play, it's incredibly heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold and Motorola Moto Z2 Play both have very similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a really bigger screen. The Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold takes clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger diafragm aperture and higher video frame rate. Galaxy Fold features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.