Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy M20 is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's extremely heavier and extremely thicker. The Moto Z2 Play has a little faster processor than Galaxy M20. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy M20 has a screen that is very similar to Motorola Moto Z2 Play's display, although the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a quite greater pixels amount per inch in the screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite bigger screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way better video resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a way better battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.