Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a score of 87.7 against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy M51 construction is newer, but incredibly heavier and way thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Moto Z2 Play and the Galaxy M51 have quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy M51 has a quite lower pixels amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a slightly better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M51 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 133 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.