Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body is way newer, but a lot heavier and a lot thicker than the Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 features a better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Moto Z2 Play has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.