Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Play's, although it's noticeably heavier and notably thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a larger display and a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.