Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Moto Z2 Play's general score of 77.4. Even though the Galaxy Note 3 is a better device than Moto Z2 Play, we must tell that it's also older, a lot thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, and they both have an equal 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a bit larger display.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Galaxy Note 3 features a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Note 3 is more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.