Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-06-29 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, with an 80.4 score against 77.4. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a thicker and heavier cellphone than the Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560, more pixels per inch in the display and a bit larger screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play. They have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.