Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the Moto Z2 Play, with an 86.2 score against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is newer than Moto Z2 Play's, although it's incredibly thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note10 Lite takes clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same video definition and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has better video frame rate.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.