Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a 77.7 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 construction is noticeably older, noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Moto Z2 Play has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 1920px resolution, the Moto Z2 Play also counts with a little greater display density.
The Moto Z2 Play has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. The Moto Z2 Play has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note3 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy Note3 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.