Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-06-29 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has a general score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. The Galaxy Note7 is an older, thicker and heavier device than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little bit better display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite bigger display.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has more cores.
Galaxy Note7 has a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Play. Both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a 12 MP camera in the back. Galaxy Note7 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.