Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. Galaxy S10's design is newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it is notably thicker and a little heavier. Galaxy S10 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3040 resolution, a little bigger display and a greater screen density.
The Galaxy S10 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and faster video frame rate.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.