Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is a lot better than the Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. Galaxy S10 5G's body is newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, although it's a lot heavier and noticeably thicker. The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a higher number of pixels per screen inch, a larger display and a way better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger aperture and higher video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.