Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Moto Z2 Play, with an 89.7 score against 77.4. The Galaxy S10 Lite is a way newer phone than Moto Z2 Play, although it is extremely heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite costs more than Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.