Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. Although Galaxy S10e is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it is a little bit heavier and noticeably thicker. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, a just a bit better quantity of pixels per display inch and a bit larger display.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10e has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e features just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S10e features a slightly better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy S10e also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z2 Play, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.