Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a score of 94.8 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a extremely newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it is heavier and way thicker. Galaxy S20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a lot better 1440 x 3200px resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a much higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy S20 counts with improved battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.