Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. Even though Galaxy S20 FE is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it is notably heavier and extremely thicker. The Galaxy S20 FE features a little sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite higher count of pixels in each display inch, a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S20 FE takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.