Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a 98 score against 77.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's notably heavier and noticeably thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.